Real performance vs statistics gaming, budget manipulation, management failures, political capture, and why we cannot answer most questions.
Best Viewed on Desktop
This page contains detailed charts and visualizations that are optimized for larger screens.
This is the most important section. Everything else documents waste and inefficiency. This section asks why it continues.
We spend $6 billion annually on NYPD and cannot answer 71% of essential performance questions.
This is not incompetence. Every competent organization tracks cost per outcome, quality metrics, and efficiency patterns. NYPD either does not track these or refuses to share them.
Why does this continue? Political capture. Union power. Management resistance. Fear of accountability. Deliberate opacity as strategy.
Until we understand why accountability fails, reform is impossible.
Clearance quality versus clearance quantity
Clearance rates can be gamed by clearing cases without arrests or clearing the wrong person. If precincts pressure detectives to close cases regardless of quality, statistics look good but justice is not served.
Case closure quality analysis: clearances by arrest vs exceptional means, with outcome tracking
FOIL request: "Clearances by type (arrest, exceptional clearance, unfounded) with subsequent case outcomes (conviction, dismissal, exoneration) by precinct and crime type"
Statistical manipulation patterns
If precincts with low clearance rates suddenly improve by reclassifying crimes or clearing dubious cases, that is gaming metrics rather than improving performance. Anomaly detection reveals manipulation.
Time-series analysis of clearance rates with case reclassification data
FOIL request: "Crime reclassification rates by precinct (cases downgraded or unfounded), clearance rate changes over time, and audit reports on clearance quality"
False clearance rates
Clearing the wrong person is worse than not clearing a case: the real perpetrator remains free and an innocent person is harmed. False clearance rates reveal investigation quality failures.
Exoneration data and wrongful conviction tracking
Innocence Project data + FOIL request: "Cases with subsequent exonerations or dismissals after initial clearance, by precinct and crime type (2010-2025)"
Resource allocation equity
We have borough-level spending data: Manhattan receives $1.36B in total NYPD compensation (43% of total) for 1.6M people ($850/capita). Bronx receives $292M for 1.4M people ($208/capita). Manhattan receives 4x more police spending per capita despite similar crime rates. This suggests massive over-policing in wealthy areas and under-policing in others.
Budget manipulation patterns
NYPD has underestimated overtime by an average of 35% for a decade. Either management is incompetent at forecasting or deliberately lowballs estimates to hide true costs. Pattern analysis reveals intentionality.
Decade of budgeted vs actual overtime spending with forecasting methodology
FOIL request: "NYPD overtime budget projections vs actual spending (2010-2025), including forecasting methodology and variance explanations provided to City Council"
Compensation structure analysis
If officers earn more through overtime than base pay and face no consequences for excessive OT, the system incentivizes inefficiency. Understanding compensation incentives reveals why overtime is out of control.
Overtime policy analysis and compensation structure review
FOIL request: "NYPD overtime authorization policies, approval thresholds, and analysis of total compensation (base + OT) distribution by rank and tenure"
Budget category gaming
If NYPD shifts costs from visible categories (personnel) to obscure ones (equipment, technology) or uses external contracts to hide spending, true costs are concealed from oversight. Budget transparency audit reveals manipulation.
Complete budget execution data across all categories and contract spending
FOIL request: "Complete NYPD budget execution reports by category (2015-2025), including contract spending, inter-agency transfers, and budget modification explanations"
The meta accountability question
This entire analysis exists because NYPD refuses to track or share basic metrics that any competent organization monitors: cost per clearance, precinct-level efficiency, response times, conviction rates, technology ROI. This is not incompetence - it is deliberate strategy to avoid accountability.
Accountability for failure
If low-performing precincts face no consequences while high-performing ones receive no rewards, there is no incentive to improve. Understanding accountability mechanisms reveals whether management drives performance or protects mediocrity.
Precinct commander performance evaluations and tenure analysis
FOIL request: "Precinct commander performance metrics, evaluation criteria, tenure by precinct, and correlation between precinct performance and commander career outcomes"
Organizational learning failure
Bronx clears 62.6% of rapes at $5,776 per clearance. Manhattan clears 31.4% at $86,292 per clearance. If Bronx practices were replicated citywide, we would save hundreds of millions while improving outcomes. That this has not happened after years of data reveals management failure or deliberate resistance to efficiency.
Resistance to structural reform
77 precincts made sense in 1950 but not with modern technology and transportation. Resistance to structural reform despite clear inefficiency reveals political and bureaucratic capture preventing needed change.
Historical analysis of proposed reforms and political resistance
FOIL request: "Proposals for NYPD structural reform (precinct consolidation, civilianization, management delayering) from 2000-2025, including reasons for rejection"
Union contract analysis
If union contracts prevent firing bad officers, mandate excessive overtime, or block efficiency reforms, the union prioritizes member income over public safety. Contract analysis reveals constraints on reform.
Police union contract provisions and their impact on management flexibility
Police union contracts are public. Analysis needed: "Provisions affecting discipline, termination, overtime, work rules, and management authority in PBA and other NYPD union contracts"
Political economy of police reform
If mayors who challenge NYPD inefficiency face coordinated political attacks (union campaigns, negative media, coordinated slowdowns), that explains why obvious reforms never happen. Political economy analysis reveals power dynamics.
Historical analysis of mayor-NYPD conflicts and political consequences
Academic research and media analysis: Document conflicts between mayors and NYPD (de Blasio, Bloomberg, Giuliani) and resulting political fallout
Internal incentive analysis
If officers are promoted based on political loyalty rather than performance, the system rewards compliance over competence. Promotion pattern analysis reveals whether merit or politics drives advancement.
Promotion data with prior performance metrics
FOIL request: "NYPD promotions by rank with prior assignment, performance evaluations, and demographic data (2015-2025)" to analyze promotion patterns
Intentional opacity versus incompetence
Of 120 essential questions, we can answer ~25 (21%) and partially answer ~10 (8%). The remaining 71% lack data because NYPD does not track metrics that every competent organization monitors OR tracks them but refuses to share. This is not incompetence - tracking these metrics is standard practice. This is deliberate strategy to avoid accountability.
The price of transparency
Modern data infrastructure is cheap. A comprehensive NYPD performance dashboard tracking clearances, costs, response times, and efficiency metrics would cost $5-10M to build and $1-2M annually to maintain. This is 0.08-0.17% of NYPD budget. The barrier is not cost - it is unwillingness to be accountable.
Transparency as accountability
Every major police department in progressive cities (LA, Seattle, Philadelphia) publishes real-time performance dashboards with clearance rates, response times, use of force, and budget data by precinct. NYPD publishes basic crime statistics but hides performance metrics. This is deliberate - transparency drives accountability, and NYPD resists accountability.
Incentive analysis
Understanding who benefits from opacity reveals who will resist transparency. If inefficient precincts, poorly performing officers, and politically connected leadership benefit from hiding metrics, they will block reform.
Political economy analysis of accountability resistance
Academic research: Analyze stakeholder incentives around NYPD transparency and accountability reforms
The reform potential
If transparency revealed that Manhattan wastes $450M annually on inefficient policing, public pressure would force reform. Understanding reform potential reveals why transparency is resisted.
Scenario analysis of transparency-driven reforms
Policy analysis: Model potential budget savings and outcome improvements if NYPD implemented best practices identified through transparency
The path to reform
If voluntary transparency will never happen, forced mechanisms are needed: City Council mandates, charter amendments, independent oversight with subpoena power. Understanding leverage points drives reform strategy.
Legal and political analysis of accountability mechanisms
Policy research: Identify legal mechanisms (charter amendments, local laws, budget conditions) that could mandate NYPD performance transparency and accountability
The Problem Is Clear: NYPD deliberately avoids tracking or sharing performance metrics that would enable accountability. This is not incompetence - it is strategy.
Why It Continues: Political capture. Union contracts that prevent discipline and mandate overtime. Management that rewards loyalty over performance. Mayors who fear challenging NYPD. Media that rarely demands data-driven accountability.
Voluntary Transparency Will Never Happen: Organizations do not voluntarily adopt accountability that threatens their interests. NYPD will never willingly publish data showing Manhattan wastes $450M annually or that overtime is systematically gamed.
What Would Work:
The technical solutions are trivial: $10M gets you complete performance transparency. The political barriers are enormous: entrenched interests benefit from opacity. Reform requires political will to force accountability on an organization that has successfully resisted it for decades.
By documenting exactly what we do not know and why it matters, we make the case for forced transparency. Every question without an answer is evidence of deliberate opacity.
Share this analysis. Demand answers. Support politicians who will mandate transparency. File FOIL requests. Build the pressure that forces accountability.